home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.u-net.com!news
- From: bryce@gothic.u-net.com (CountB)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications,comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
- Subject: Re: Is MUI processor intensive?
- Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.applications,comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
- Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 19:18:31
- Organization: Gothsoft Developments II
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <1996020869510bryce@gothic.u-net.com>
- References: <9601300825.AA003em@hectortd.demon.co.uk> <487.6609T1155T528@login.dknet.dk> <4fda36$fve@ra.nrl.navy.mil>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: gothic.u-net.com
- X-Newsreader: TIN [AMIGA 1.3 950726BETA PL0]
-
- Greg Jung (jung@osse.nrl.navy.mil) wrote:
- >
- > In article <487.6609T1155T528@login.dknet.dk>, nilo@login.dknet.dk (Nicolai Thilo) writes:
- > |>In article <9601300825.AA003em@hectortd.demon.co.uk>, Paul Copsey (paul@hectortd.demon.co.uk) wrote:
- > |>
- > |>You are spoiled by the speed of gadtools. I happily use MUI on my
- > |>7MHz A2000 with a slow 30MB harddisk and 3MB RAM.
-
- Funny idea of 'happy' you have. Until I got a Picasso MUI was unusable in
- 256 colours on my 4000/40.
-
- 3.2 is nippy tho, well done Olly.
- --
- James ^o^ CountB ^o^ http://www.u-net.com/~gothic
-
- "Hold me now.... Keep me alive!!!!!" - All About Eve
-
-